“Corporate Accountability Now” Website Launched As Supreme Court Prepares to Consider Whether Corporations Can Be Held Liable for Crimes Against Humanity, Torture

Corporate Accountability Now” Website Launched As Supreme Court Prepares to Consider Whether Corporations Can Be Held Liable for Crimes Against Humanity, Torture

WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 13, 2012 — As the U.S Supreme Court prepares to consider whether corporations are immune from liability for human rights violations, a coalition of leading human rights groups has launched a campaign and website called Corporate Accountability Now. The campaign is dedicated to the proposition that if corporations have the same rights as people when it comes to free speech, then they should be responsible for their actions when they commit grave crimes.

The Corporate Accountability Now website includes information about the law and cases at issue, why these issues matter, and how to get involved.

The upcoming Supreme Court argument coincides with widespread popular discontent over the impact of the Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United, which found that corporations have broad rights that enable them to affect public policy. In the two cases before the Court on Feb. 28, the Justices will be asked to determine whether corporations can be sued for their complicity in torture, crimes against humanity and other human rights abuses.

The Court’s decision will have profound implications for the future of corporate accountability in the United States. The Supreme Court has decided that corporations have rights just like human beings — now the Court must decide whether corporations also have the same responsibilities, or whether a corporation is only a ‘person’ when it benefits the company.

One of the cases is Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, which alleges that Royal Dutch/Shell was complicit in crimes against humanity in Nigeria in the 1990s, when numerous Nigerians from the Ogoni region were killed and tortured for their opposition to oil activities in their territory and criticism of Shell. The second case, Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority, charges that agents of the Palestinian Authority tortured and killed a U.S. citizen in the West Bank. Kiobel involves the Alien Tort Statute and Mohamad involves the Torture Victim Protection Act.

For more information, visit www.corporateaccountabilitynow.org.

Corporate Accountability Now is a joint project of EarthRights International, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and the Human Rights Litigation and International Legal Advocacy Clinic at the University of Minnesota Law School. Corporate Accountability Now does not represent the plaintiffs in either Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum or Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority, but the sponsoring organizations have filed amicus briefs in these cases.

###

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s